2024-10-03T01:17:10.987Z | <Dan Mick> looking at the list archives, there are emails, but mostly spam. The last "real" test-run email was the one you mention. |
2024-10-03T01:17:56.760Z | <Dan Mick> I assume these messages originate from teuthology? (Do you have one handy that you can examine all the headers and see?) |
2024-10-03T01:18:33.339Z | <badone> Yes Dan, hanng on a sec |
2024-10-03T01:19:04.232Z | <Dan Mick> there are some recents addressed to "[ceph-qa@ceph.com](mailto:ceph-qa@ceph.com)", surely an old address; maybe [ceph.com](http://ceph.com), whatever serves it, has changed not to forward them |
2024-10-03T01:19:34.125Z | <badone> ```Received: from [172.19.199.2] (unknown [172.19.199.2]) by [lists.ceph.io](http://lists.ceph.io) (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8441E13260B; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:25:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by [lists.ceph.io](http://lists.ceph.io) (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 219B11319B5; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [pdx1-sub0-mail-mx205.dreamhost.com](http://pdx1-sub0-mail-mx205.dreamhost.com) ([fltr-in1.mail.dreamhost.com](http://fltr-in1.mail.dreamhost.com) [64.90.62.163]) by [lists.ceph.io](http://lists.ceph.io) (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C3E13260B for <ceph-qa@ceph.io>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [postfix-inbound-v2-0.inbound.mailchannels.net](http://postfix-inbound-v2-0.inbound.mailchannels.net) ([inbound-egress-5.mailchannels.net](http://inbound-egress-5.mailchannels.net) [199.10.31.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by [pdx1-sub0-mail-mx205.dreamhost.com](http://pdx1-sub0-mail-mx205.dreamhost.com) (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X8kVD3tgvz4t2f for <ceph-qa@ceph.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inbound-trex-1 (unknown [127.0.0.6]) by [postfix-inbound-v2-0.inbound.mailchannels.net](http://postfix-inbound-v2-0.inbound.mailchannels.net) (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8BF34158B for <ceph-qa@ceph.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:25:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Message-ID: QhXaxtDrwYIjQkYmPjVqcIaX
Received: from [teuthology.front.sepia.ceph.com](http://teuthology.front.sepia.ceph.com) ([UNAVAILABLE]. [8.43.84.3]) by 100.117.124.206 (trex/6.10.3); Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:25:56 +0000``` |
2024-10-03T01:20:11.119Z | <Dan Mick> first, we should find whatever's using [ceph.com](http://ceph.com) and stop it, make it use [ceph.io](http://ceph.io) |
2024-10-03T01:20:24.415Z | <Dan Mick> but that looks like it's going through redhat's MX |
2024-10-03T01:21:08.090Z | <badone> It originates from [teuthology.front.sepia.ceph.com](http://teuthology.front.sepia.ceph.com) though right? |
2024-10-03T01:21:16.939Z | <Dan Mick> yes I believe so |
2024-10-03T01:21:26.172Z | <Dan Mick> that host shows some DNS errors looking up the MX for [ceph.com](http://ceph.com) |
2024-10-03T01:21:32.971Z | <Dan Mick> it's working now, but there are errors in the mail log |
2024-10-03T01:21:35.152Z | <badone> ack |
2024-10-03T01:22:30.435Z | <Dan Mick> there are apparently no attempts to send to [ceph-qa@ceph.io](mailto:ceph-qa@ceph.io) |
2024-10-03T01:23:21.836Z | <Dan Mick> hm. |
2024-10-03T01:23:22.189Z | <Dan Mick> I'm not sure how [ceph.com](http://ceph.com) mail is handled or adminstered. |
2024-10-03T01:23:36.146Z | <Dan Mick> I could be high about mailconnections; that might be Dreamhost, hang on |
2024-10-03T01:23:47.774Z | <badone> We may break everyone's filters if we change the address |
2024-10-03T01:24:02.914Z | <Dan Mick> shit happens, [ceph.com](http://ceph.com) is obsolete |
2024-10-03T01:24:09.514Z | <badone> sck |
2024-10-03T01:24:19.740Z | <badone> ack |
2024-10-03T01:26:11.116Z | <Dan Mick> hm. Dreamhost shows no domains registered. |
2024-10-03T01:27:07.711Z | <Dan Mick> right, right, the domain is on ns1 |
2024-10-03T01:27:41.519Z | <badone> Should this redirect then? <https://www.ceph.com/en/> |
2024-10-03T01:28:30.106Z | <badone> I guess it does, or at least it's a mirror |
2024-10-03T01:28:34.720Z | <Dan Mick> that points to the public gw |
2024-10-03T01:28:45.991Z | <Dan Mick> same as [www.ceph.io](http://www.ceph.io) |
2024-10-03T01:29:20.821Z | <Dan Mick> yes, that's right. The domain was pointing to redhat, and then redhat's DNS got put on ns1. It's there. |
2024-10-03T01:30:21.824Z | <Dan Mick> the mx points to mailchannels, and that, I believe, is a service DH uses for mail, but I don't know where it goes next; let me look at those headers again more carefully |
2024-10-03T01:31:00.850Z | <Dan Mick> yes, through dreamhost |
2024-10-03T01:31:19.077Z | <Dan Mick> (mailchannels did nontrivial useful spam filtering, is why it's still set up that way) |
2024-10-03T01:31:43.493Z | <Dan Mick> so all the addresses are supposed to forward to [ceph.io](http://ceph.io) |
2024-10-03T01:32:36.569Z | <Dan Mick> sending a test |
2024-10-03T02:11:36.990Z | <Dan Mick> test didn't go through. I suspect some issues with Dreamhost, probably. |
2024-10-03T02:11:58.771Z | <Dan Mick> I can temporarily change the MX to point to [ceph.io](http://ceph.io), I guess. |
2024-10-03T02:12:46.391Z | <Dan Mick> hm, no, something will have to change to accept/forward the domain if it's not DH. I'll think on it. |
2024-10-03T02:15:39.060Z | <badone> Thanks for your effort on this Dan |
2024-10-03T02:27:47.490Z | <Dan Mick> the easiest answer is to switch to [ceph-qa@ceph.io](mailto:ceph-qa@ceph.io) |
2024-10-03T02:28:12.247Z | <Dan Mick> but we need a more-global answer anyway. |
2024-10-03T02:51:15.520Z | <Dan Mick> filed a support ticket with DH. It appears the forwarding has changed how it works. Also discovered that postfix on [lists.ceph.io](http://lists.ceph.io) is prepared to handle email to [ceph.com](http://ceph.com) if it were to arrive directly. |
2024-10-03T02:51:51.701Z | <badone> Ok, let's see how they respond then I guess? |
2024-10-03T02:55:06.571Z | <Dan Mick> yes, and simultaneously develop a plan to get them out of the loop |
2024-10-03T02:55:25.430Z | <Dan Mick> it's been an item fairly far down on a long list, but maybe it just got a priority bump |
2024-10-03T02:55:26.696Z | <badone> Yeah, probably a good idea |
2024-10-03T08:52:50.674Z | <Jose J Palacios-Perez> Sorry, its because I created my container image on a sepia lab box, and wanted to push it to a registry, sorry for the confusion |
2024-10-03T08:53:30.875Z | <Jose J Palacios-Perez> its because I created my container image on a sepia lab box, and wanted to push it to a registry, sorry for the confusion |
2024-10-03T08:54:03.535Z | <Jose J Palacios-Perez> its because I created my container image on a sepia lab box, and wanted to push it to a registry, was wondering which one to use, sorry for the confusion |
2024-10-03T14:59:47.679Z | <Mark Nelson (nhm)> Hey folks, the performance meeting is starting now: <https://meet.google.com/uhb-cysu-nvg> |
2024-10-03T15:01:16.231Z | <Laura Flores> Hi all, I had a conflict with the Infrastructure meeting, so I moved it up half an hour earlier today. I hope that still works for most people @Adam Kraitman @Dan Mick @Zack Cerza @Casey Bodley @Ken Dreyer @Patrick Donnelly @John Mulligan |
2024-10-03T15:45:46.181Z | <Bharath> @Dan Mick, The Shaman build has been running continuously for the past 24 hours.I noticed that their is a null pointer exception from the mira024 node.
```java.lang.NullPointerException: no workspace from node hudson.slaves.DumbSlave[172.21.4.130+mira024] which is computer hudson.slaves.SlaveComputer@33829033 and has channel null```
Shaman build - <https://shaman.ceph.com/builds/ceph/wip-bharath15-testing-2024-10-02-1952-quincy/>
Could you please fix this issue |
2024-10-03T16:00:07.137Z | <Laura Flores> @yuriw |
2024-10-03T16:53:51.445Z | <Ken Dreyer> Thanks for the heads' up Laura about the time change. Thanks also for running the meeting today. |